Mike Ozekhome, SAN
hehehehe......... Senior
Advocate of Nigeria, Mike Ozekhome has had his N75 million frozen by
the EFCC unfrozen following a decision by the Federal High Court in
Lagos.
In a ruling on Monday, Justice Abdulaziz Anka of the Federal High
Court in Lagos has dismissed an interim order barring a Senior Advocate
of Nigeria, Chief Mike Ozekhome, from accessing his Guaranty Trust Bank
account into which he received N75m legal fee from the Ekiti State
Governor, Ayodele Fayose.
The interim order obtained by the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission on February 7, 2017, had stopped Ozekhome from dissipating
the N75m on the grounds that it formed part of proceeds of alleged
criminal activities by Fayose. The EFCC claimed that the N75m which
Fayose paid to Ozekhome was part of the N2.26bn arms procurement funds,
which a former National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki (retd.),
allegedly looted.
The anti-graft agency claimed to have traced N1.22bn out of the
N2.26bn, which Dasuki allegedly looted, to Fayose. Ozekhome who was
displeased by the order had challenged the EFCC in court urging the
court to vacate the interim order.
While giving his ruling on Monday, the judge said though it was not
in doubt that the N75m came from Fayose, Ozekhome could not be held
liable because there was no restriction on Fayose’s account as of the
time the N75m was paid to his law firm.
Justice Anka noted that the freezing order earlier obtained by the
EFCC in respect of Fayose’s accounts had been lifted by Justice Taiwo
Taiwo of the Federal High Court in Ado-Ekiti.
Justice Anka said he would not allow himself to be lured into
sitting as an appellate judge over the counter-decisions of Justice
Mohammed Idris who earlier froze Fayose’s accounts and Justice Taiwo who
later unfroze the accounts.
Justice Anka held, “There is no argument whatsoever as to the
source of the funds as rightly argued by the learned counsel for the
EFCC, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo, but the question is: can the
respondent/applicant be liable for any infraction as of the time he
received the amount in his account?
“His evidence was not controverted that the same proceeds were
unencumbered as of the time they were transferred into the account of
Mike Ozekhome Chambers as rightly argued by Chief Mike Ozekhome.
“The Federal High Court sitting in Ado Ekiti, Coram Taiwo J,
ordered that the unfreezing of the said account belonging to Governor
Ayodele Fayose.
“…considering the order above quoted and the depositions, I do
not understand or comprehend why the applicant/respondent’s counsel, Mr
Rotimi Oyedepo, would still argue and stand his ground that the same
account has not be unfrozen by the Federal High Court sitting in Ekiti
State.
“In both the order and the depositions, the account numbered
1000312625, was evidently and manifestly unfrozen, such an argument,
therefore, by Mr Oyedepo Esq cannot hold water.”
In the final analysis, the judge said he found sufficient grounds
to reject the EFCC’s counter-affidavit, including the fact that Ozekhome
had already dissipated the N75m which the EFCC sought to stop him from
touching.
He added, “From the circumstances and facts as outlined above,
my decision is based on the following considerations: considering the
fact that the source of the fund of the respondent/applicant is
derivable from an unencumbered account; considering also the fact that
such account has also been unfrozen via the order of the Federal High
Court sitting in Ado-Ekiti; considering also that the amount has been
dissipated; put into consideration also was the fact that the funds are
monies paid for the services rendered by the respondent/applicant in
prosecuting various actions before various courts..I find it very
doubtful if the objection of the EFCC can be lawfully sustained.”
Ozekhome had in his application contended that the action of the
EFCC was unconstitutional, had no legal justification and was a gross
violation of sections 36, 37 and 41 of the 1999 Constitution.
No comments:
Post a Comment